Site icon DIY Usthad

Top 5 Open-Source MQTT Brokers in 2025: Features and Comparison

Open Source MQTT Brokers

The Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem in 2025 is more dynamic than ever. Connected devices—from smart home appliances to industrial monitoring systems—have proliferated, demanding secure and efficient data communication channels. One protocol has remained at the heart of these IoT deployments: MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport).

A crucial piece of any MQTT-based architecture is the MQTT broker, which routes messages between publishers and subscribers. In this blog post, we explore Open-Source MQTT Brokers—highlighting five standout solutions, discussing their key features, and comparing how they stack up across various use cases.


Why Open-Source MQTT Brokers Matter

Open-Source MQTT Brokers have steadily gained popularity due to their flexibility, transparency, and active community support. Whether you’re deploying on a small embedded device or orchestrating an entire enterprise IoT solution, these brokers provide:

  1. Cost Effectiveness – No licensing fees and the freedom to modify source code.
  2. Community-Driven Innovation – Rapid development cycles, timely patches, and expansive plugin ecosystems.
  3. Scalability – Ability to handle anything from a handful of devices to millions of concurrent connections.

1. Eclipse Mosquitto

Overview:
Eclipse Mosquitto, a project under the Eclipse Foundation, has been a go-to choice for IoT enthusiasts and professionals for over a decade. Its lightweight footprint and standards compliance make it a favorite for both small-scale and enterprise deployments.

Key Features:

Ideal Use Cases:


2. EMQX

Overview:
EMQX (formerly EMQ) has evolved into one of the most powerful Open-Source MQTT Brokers in the market. Written in Erlang/OTP, EMQX offers massive scalability and fault-tolerance out of the box, handling millions of concurrent connections.

Key Features:

Ideal Use Cases:


3. VerneMQ

Overview:
VerneMQ is another Erlang-based broker known for high availability and scalability. It uses a masterless clustering architecture, ensuring no single node is a bottleneck or point of failure. VerneMQ’s strong focus on security, stability, and extensibility makes it perfect for mission-critical IoT deployments.

Key Features:

Ideal Use Cases:


4. HiveMQ Community Edition

Overview:
HiveMQ has a strong reputation in the commercial MQTT world. Its Community Edition (CE) brings many enterprise-grade features to the open-source arena. Built in Java, HiveMQ CE focuses on reliability, performance, and developer-friendly integrations.

Key Features:

Ideal Use Cases:


5. RabbitMQ (with MQTT Plugin)

Overview:
RabbitMQ is famous for AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) but offers an MQTT plugin that transforms it into a hybrid messaging system. This approach is attractive for teams that need a unified messaging solution under a single broker.

Key Features:

Ideal Use Cases:


Feature Comparison Table

Below is a high-level comparison of these Open-Source MQTT Brokers in key areas:

BrokerInstallation GuidesLanguageLicenseClusteringMQTT VersionsScalabilityExtensibilitySuitable For
Mosquitto1. Raspberry Pi
2. Ubuntu
3. Android
CEPL/EDL (Eclipse)Bridging (not a full cluster)3.1.1 & 5.0Moderate (lightweight)External plugins/hooksSmall to mid-scale IoT, hobbyists
EMQX1. Raspberry PiErlang/OTPApache 2.0Masterless cluster3.1.1 & 5.0Massive (millions)Rich plugin ecosystemLarge-scale enterprise, industrial IoT
VerneMQ1. UbuntuErlang/OTPApache 2.0Masterless cluster3.1.1 & 5.0Massive (millions)Lua-based extensions, pluginsHigh availability, fault-tolerant setups
HiveMQ CEGeneral GuideJavaApache 2.0Basic clustering (more in commercial)3.1.1 & 5.0HighJava plugin frameworkCommercial IoT, large-scale Java shops
RabbitMQ1. Raspberry PiErlangMPL 2.0Traditional clustering & federation3.1.1 & 5.0 (plugin)HighPlugin-based architectureHybrid protocols, enterprise messaging

Conclusion

By carefully evaluating the Open-Source MQTT Brokers listed above, you can match the right solution to your project’s unique demands—whether it’s a home automation project with modest needs or a large-scale industrial IoT deployment handling millions of messages per second. Here’s a quick recap:

Consider factors like deployment size, security requirements, cloud vs. on-premises setup, and existing infrastructure when choosing your broker. With the growing IoT landscape in 2025, selecting the right Open-Source MQTT Brokers will ensure reliable, scalable, and future-proof messaging for your devices and applications.

My Choice

As a DIY enthusiast I’ll choose Eclipse Mosquitto is usually the first pick. Why? It’s simple to install, doesn’t hog resources, and even runs smoothly on basic hardware like Raspberry Pi. It’s lightweight, easy to tweak, and perfect for stuff like home automation or small prototypes. If you just want something that works fast without a headache, Mosquitto is the right choice.

Exit mobile version